Evaluating the PCL-5 in China: new insights from its assessments over time and gender invariance

Table 2 Confirmatory factor analysis fit indicators for the PCL-5

Model	S-Bχ²	df	CFI	TLI	SRMR	RMSEA	RMSEA90%CI	BIC
Model 1	391.493	164	0.967	0.962	0.030	0.028	0.025–0.032	79,315.027
Model 2	390.716	164	0.967	0.962	0.030	0.026	0.025–0.032	79,315.147
Model 3	362.121	160	0.971	0.965	0.029	0.027	0.023–0.031	79,272.760
Model 4	348.812	155	0.972	0.966	0.027	0.028	0.023–0.030	79,278.203
Model 5	283.236	155	0.981	0.977	0.025	0.022	0.018–0.026	79,114.196
Model 6	264.704	149	0.983	0.979	0.024	0.021	0.017–0.025	79,113.109
Model 7	234.071	142	0.987	0.982	0.022	0.019	0.015–0.024	79,094.801

S-Bχ² = Satorra-Bentler chi-square goodness of fit; df = degrees of freedom; CFI = comparative fit index; TLI = Tucker–Lewis index; SRMR = standardized root mean square residual; RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation; 90% CIs = 90% confidence intervals for RMSEA; BIC = Bayesian Information Criterion. In order to compare the model fitting indicators in more detail, the statistical values in this table are rounded to three decimal places, the same applies below

ISSN: 1744-859X